I used to say I was the opposite of a conflict avoider. If there was something wrong between us, I would always talk to you about it. As I’ve gotten older I’ve realized that isn't really a good way to describe me. It seems that the opposite of a conflict avoider would be someone who seeks out and enjoys conflict. Some people revel in debate and confrontation. That is 100% not me.
I don’t enjoy the mess and hard work of clarification to fix a miscommunication. It grieves my heart to confront and then someone has to suffer the consequences of their own actions.
But I do love genuine peace. Conflict avoiding is not real peace-making, it is peace-faking. I hate the pain and bitterness of peace-faking more the pain and mess of peace-making.
If I confront you with something that hurt me, then take it as a compliment. I either care about our relationship enough to fight for it, and/or I believe you are healthy enough to have a dialogue.
If I seek to clarify a miscommunication it is because I have given you the benefit of the doubt that you didn’t mean it the way it came across. It also means I believe you will give me the benefit of the doubt when I am vulnerable about my confusion.
I used to confront an clarify with EVERYONE, because I didn’t want to be in conflict with ANYONE. I can thank my people-pleasing tendencies for that and I’ve learned that isn’t a safe space to be either. I have to discern what relationships are worth fighting for and who is safe enough to be vulnerable with my hurt or confusion.
When I stop feeling the safety to confront and need to clarify, the relationship is probably about to die. Recently I was reminded that when I stop clarifying or confronting, it does the opposite of keeping the peace, it make my heart bitter and slowly the relationship dies.
No comments:
Post a Comment